On April 6, 2021, the first hearing of the first instance of a dispute over the confirmation of the validity of a company resolution, which was represented by our firm, was held.

One of the disputed issues in this case is as follows: A shareholder on our side had requested the people's court to confirm the validity of two resolutions of the company, and the case was still under second-instance trial (hereinafter referred to as the "previous case"). A shareholder on the opposing side then filed a lawsuit requesting to confirm the invalidity of the two resolutions (hereinafter referred to as the "current case"). At this time, the question was whether the current case should be suspended.

We believed that: The content involved in the claims made by the shareholder on the opposing side in the current case was currently being tried in the second instance of the previous case, and the judgment of the current case needed to be based on the trial results of the previous case. Therefore, the current case should be suspended.

The court also adopted our view and made a ruling on the same day to suspend the litigation of the current case.